Saturday, September 23, 2023
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
Newsroom 104
  • Home
  • Bay Area
  • Nation
  • 2022 Elections
  • 2020 Elections
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Bay Area
  • Nation
  • 2022 Elections
  • 2020 Elections
  • About Us
No Result
View All Result
NEWSROOM 104
No Result
View All Result
Home Elections 2022

Voters reject attempts to legalize sports betting in California

by Ells Boone
November 9, 2022
in Elections 2022
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Ells Boone and Alex Wei

Once largely frowned upon nationwide, sports betting has taken over the country in the last few years. Today it is nearly impossible to watch a game on TV, scroll through social media, or follow your favorite sports team without seeing an advertisement for a sports betting company and being fed the points spread for a specific game. However, California voters are not ready to legalize this new normal.  

There were two sports betting measures on the statewide ballot Tuesday. Proposition 26 would have allowed in-person wagering only at the 62 Native American tribal casinos and four horse racetracks in California. Tribal casinos would also have been able to add dice games and roulette in addition to their current offerings. Proposition 27 would have legalized mobile and online sports betting on sites such as DraftKings, FanDuel, and BetMGM. That measure would also have required each company launching an app in California to partner with a tribal government.

Although some votes were still to be counted, Propositions 27 and 26 were getting resounding no’s from voters. 

Illegal for a long time in the United States, the Supreme Court in 2018 struck down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992. The court’s ruling in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association paved the way for sports betting to be legalized by individual states. In the four years since then, l30 states and Washington, D.C. have made betting on sports legal. 

California, with the nation’s largest population, represented an untapped market for betting companies. 

According to data published by the San Francisco Chronicle,  this was the most expensive ballot fight in state history. About $121 million was raised in support of Proposition 26, with $44 million in opposition. About $169 million was raised for the Proposition 27 effort, and a whopping $238 million to oppose it. 

Even though both propositions would have been able to coexist in legislation if approved, the campaign battle quickly turned into a Proposition 26 vs. Proposition 27 debate. DraftKings ran ads against Proposition 26, while Native American tribes put their money into No on 27 campaigns. These efforts, among others, confused voters and muddied perceptions on the two measures.

Not every tribe supported Proposition 26 over 27, however. The Big Valley Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians, along with the Middletown Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians, supported Proposition 27 since neither tribe has a major casino. 

With both propositions having been soundly rejected, California bettors will likely have to wait until the next election cycle to revisit the issue. The CEO of DraftKings, Jason Robins, has already called for another try in 2024.

California remains critical to the future of the sports betting industry, and national gambling operators will continue to try to penetrate the market. However, California’s strong rejection of Proposition 27 may have shown that tribes have more power than multibillion-dollar corporations.

Tribes which saw Proposition 27 as a threat to their gaming exclusivity will likely remain hostile towards legalizing online sports gambling. They will also continue to lobby for Proposition 26, as this election cycle has solidified tribes’ belief that voters support them and believe they have been responsible casino hosts in California.

Photo purchased from AP Images

Tags: sportsbetting
Ells Boone

Ells Boone

Ells Boone is a junior pursuing a degree in communication. In addition to his academic pursuits, he is the managing editor of The Stanford Daily's sports section and a manager for the Stanford Men's Basketball team.

Alex Wei

Alex Wei

Alex Wei is a senior pursuing a degree in Economics.

Next Post
Democracy Day fails to energize campus, students say

Democracy Day fails to energize campus, students say

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Video: Stanford students talk midterm elections

Video: Stanford students talk midterm elections

10 months ago
Beer, wine and community return to student-run outdoor nightspot

Beer, wine and community return to student-run outdoor nightspot

2 years ago

Popular News

Democrats, Republicans agree on one thing: campus apathy
Elections 2022

Democrats, Republicans agree on one thing: campus apathy

by Anne Li
November 9, 2022

By Anne Li and Estefanía Acuña Lacarieri Cameron Lange, a junior from Los Angeles, is the epitome of a politically...

Read more
The lights are still dim on Broadway, but ‘Blindness’ shows the way for New York theaters to reopen

The lights are still dim on Broadway, but ‘Blindness’ shows the way for New York theaters to reopen

May 20, 2021
Stanford’s first-year students diverge in summer plans after a year of disruption

Stanford’s first-year students diverge in summer plans after a year of disruption

June 9, 2021
Concerns over ethics, diversity cause some students to say no to Silicon Valley

Concerns over ethics, diversity cause some students to say no to Silicon Valley

June 12, 2021
A Santa Cruz restaurant survived by adapting to new realities; others were not so fortunate

A Santa Cruz restaurant survived by adapting to new realities; others were not so fortunate

May 19, 2021

Newsroom 104

NEWSROOM 104 is a student project in Communication 104, a Stanford University journalism course taught by R.B. Brenner. The articles, videos and podcast presented on this site are the result of original reporting by our team of journalists. Some photos were purchased from AP Images.

Menu

  • Home
  • Bay Area
  • Nation
  • 2022 Elections
  • 2020 Elections
  • About Us

About Us

We are Estefanía Acuña Lacarieri, Adia Adeogba, Ells Boone, Rani Chor, Chloe Chow, Sophie Duhameau, Zoe Edelman, Isabelle Edgar, Kyla Figueroa, Rebecca-Ann Jattan, Grace Lee, Anne Li, Itzel Luna, Emily Nichols, Danny Ritz, Joseph Sarmenta, Elli Schulz, Sonja Stevenson, Alex Wei, and Kennedy Wesley.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bay Area
  • Nation
  • Elections 2020 Previews
  • About Us

NEWSROOM 104 is a student project in Communication 104, a Stanford University journalism course taught by R.B. Brenner.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In